PNL

Poster session 08

  • Location:
    Stolz 1
  • Chairs:
     T. Knoll, Sindelfingen (DE)
     P.J.S. Osther, Fredericia (DK)
  • Poster viewing of 15 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Presentations are 3 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion.
Poster viewing
Introduction
96
Safety and efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in the management of stones located in horseshoe kidneys: A critical comparative evaluation

By: Eryildirim B.1, Kucuk E.V.2, Ozturk M.3, Senkul T.4, Tuncer M.1, Tahra A.2, Turan T.5, Ates F.4, Yilmaz O.4, Sabuncu K.1, Sarica K.1

Institutes: 1Dr.Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 4Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 5Medeniyet University, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey

97
Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of lower calyceal stones

By: Coskun A., Eryildirim B., Sabuncu K., Can U., Camur E., Sevinc A., Sarica K.

Institutes: Dr.Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey

98
Standard versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of solitary renal stones 20-30 mm

By: Petkova K., Saltirov I.

Institutes: Military Medical Academy Sofia, Dept. of Urology and Nephrology, Sofia, Bulgaria

99
Prospective comparative study of the efficacy and safety of new-generation versus early-generation system for super-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): A revolutionary approach to improving the irrigation and stone removal

By: Zeng G., Zhu W., Liu Y.

Institutes: The First Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Guangzhou, China

100
The new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) system: A step-by-step guide

By: Zeng G., Zhu W., Liu Y., Fan J.

Institutes: The First Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Guangzhou, China

101
Prospective comparative study of Super-mini Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and Miniprec for the treatment of stone larger than 2 cm

By: Zeng G., Yang L., Wei Z., Yongda L., Wen Z., Wenqi W., Junhong F., Yu L., Xiaohang L.

Institutes: The First Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Guangzhou, China

102
Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole renal calculi: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

By: Zeng G.1, Tao Z.1, Junhong F.1, Wei Z.2, Sixing Y.3, Kefeng X.4, Xuedong L.5, Hulin L.6, Xiang H.7, Changbao X.8, Sarica K.9, Agrawal M.10

Institutes: 1The First Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Guangzhou, China, 2Jiangshu Province Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Nanjing, China, 3Renmin Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Wuhan, China, 4Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Shenzhen, China, 5The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Harbin, China, 6ZhuJiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Guangzhou, China, 7Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Zhejiang, China, 8The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Dept. of Urology, Zhengzhou, China, 9Dr. Lutfi KIRDAR Kartal Research and Training Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Ankara, Turkey, 10Global Rainbow Healthcare, Dept. of Urology, New Delhi, India

103
The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)

By: Zeng G., Fan J.H

Institutes: The First Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Guangzhou, China

104
Papillary versus non papillary puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial

By: Kallidonis P., Kyriazis I., Ntasiotis P., Kotsiris D., Koutava A., Kammal W., Liatsikos E.

Institutes: University of Patras, Dept. of Urology, Patras, Greece

105
Comparison of papillary vs nonpapillary access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

By: Kucuk E.V.1, Tahra A.1, Sobay R.1, Bindayi A.1, Sarica K.2

Institutes: 1Health Sciences University Umraniye Teaching Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Health Sciences University Kartal Teaching Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey

106
Renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under sonographic guidance: Do we really need to insert an open end ureteral catheter in dilated renal systems?

By: Eryildirim B., Sabuncu K., Camur E., Ustun F., Sarica K.

Institutes: Dr.Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey

107
Inferior renal displacement using a ureteric balloon catheter: A novel renal displacement technique and a systematic review of the literature

By: Alsawi M.

Institutes: Nhs Lanarkshire, Monklands Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Airdrie, United Kingdom

108
Successful use of punction nephrolithotomy in patients with complicated form of staghorn and multiple stones

By: Imamverdiyev S., Khalilov M.

Institutes: Azerbaijan Medical University, Dept. of Urology, Baku, Azerbaijan

109
Staghorn stone composition in a contemporary series of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

By: Petkova K., Saltirov I.

Institutes: Military Medical Academy, Dept. of Urology and Nephrology, Sofia, Bulgaria

Conclusion